“Are you my sister, Mummy?”
Early studies on teenage
pregnancy
Are
you My Sister, Mummy? –ISBN 1 870717 02 3
A longitudinal study of 200 school age mums (2nd
edition, first published 1987) the first comprehensive description of the
subject in Britain. 262 pages containing statistics, case studies, questions and
answers.
This first survey provided an
important database regarding pregnant schoolgirls and their circumstances. It
was a vital piece of work since previously available information had dealt with
American groups whose population was not comparable in any demographic or social
sense. We needed information on our own population to examine the factors, risks
and social stresses of the environment pertinent to British teenagers.
An information base was
important in terms of understanding factors which led to early pregnancy and
childbearing - what motivated young people, what the family’s influence might be
and how we might intervene to help at any stage. Most important - what were the
problems? It is not sufficient to
pose the question - how do we reduce teenage pregnancies? This presupposes that
all teenage pregnancies are unwanted and problematic - clearly this is not the
case and even in the early survey years it was quite obvious that even for the
very young schoolgirl mothers there were reasons and needs for pregnancy not all
of which were undesirable.
Contact was made with every
school girl who became pregnant in a specific geographical area - covered by a
London Health District. All school girls falling pregnant and who by intent or
by default continued their pregnancies within a time limit were included -
addition to the group began in 1980 and ceased in 1987. The first 126 cases were
analysed as an MD thesis; 150 were included in the book; 174 entered long term
study.
The initial piece of research
involved a number of stages :-
Britain continues to have the highest teenage pregnancy rate in Europe. We have not yet learned the lessons of poor sexual education outlined in "Are you my sister, Mummy?" The ‘culture of poverty’ continues ...
|
|